Xang Xi Heavy Rag

page: 1

back to index | forum index | search
Sun, Aug 24, 2008	missioncreek2
3 L port 2 S port Same Specs as Rag mark III (armored)
link
Sun, Aug 24, 2008	toshiro
Take one more S port off it.
link
Sun, Aug 24, 2008	ufoman
Spammer's dream...
link
Mon, Aug 25, 2008	Surbius
Triple AGT!!! YEAH!!! >:D
link
Mon, Aug 25, 2008	zamzx zik
\o/ $@!#ing yes
link
Mon, Aug 25, 2008	moldyman
Triple swarms... How about 3L and 0S? You know, that thing called balance...
link
Mon, Aug 25, 2008	zamzx zik
As long as it doesn't get any additional thrust, balance will be had. *edit* and if that doesn't work out, reduce thrust by 10%
link
Mon, Aug 25, 2008	Surbius
Ragnarok MKIV (Bomber Variant) Armor: 16000 Cargo Capacity: 12cu Weapons: 1 small, 3 large Mass: 17000kg Length: 19m Thrust: 425N Max Speed: 65m/s Spin Torque: 10.0Nm Turbo Max Speed: 200m/s Turbo Energy: 50/sec
link
Tue, Aug 26, 2008	sfriedenberg
how about a version with 4 large, no small, extremely heavy, and very little thrust for a mega bomber that can't move?
link
Tue, Aug 26, 2008	Surbius
no
link
Tue, Aug 26, 2008	sfriedenberg
it'd be fun....if you make it move like a full moth xc, then It'll be fair......it'd be a very very heavy arms platform....
link
Tue, Aug 26, 2008	Starpwn
We are not trying to make a capship, sfriedenberg. We are trying to make a bomber that forces people to get standing with Xang Xi. I personally would like Ineubis defense systems to get this, but as long as there is new stuff, I am happy.
link
Tue, Aug 26, 2008	sfriedenberg
Ah, I didn't mean to replace the Xang Xi Heavy Rag. I meant as an entirely different variant..... and you're right that with the specs I gave it, it'd become semi-capship........although it'd be very easy to take down with any fighter......
link
Tue, Aug 26, 2008	mr_spuck
this thing would be a cool mining ship
link
Tue, Aug 26, 2008	davejohn
Hmm, might make killing queens too easy .
link
back to index | forum index | search

page: 1