Its a damn tall order, but perhaps the capella could be released, the dent buffed, and the goliath made F2P, with a series of goliaths (eg, mining-based, trading-based, fighting-based, multicrew based ect).

It'll give the F2P's an actual goal.

Personally, I'm a LTS, so it wouldn't benefit me, but it'll boost player population.

+10 Sounds nice

No capital ships for f2p.

Cappella release++
Cant say about buffing until i have any of the capships myself...

Luxen, how does it benifit you if f2p don't get a capship?

Benifits me? Nothing. It provides [yet another] incentive for people to get a subscription and actually pay for the entertainment they are getting.

But if Goliath is available to f2p, the f2p players can get a taste of what it feels like to own a capship and would want to subscribe so they could build the dent or capella.

Honestly, a lot of the f2p's actually cannot buy a sub. Like, they can't afford it.

The f2p's that CAN sub need to be invested enough to sub. And a taster of a capital-class ship should do just fine, especially if the buffed dent and Cappella are running circles around it.

I mean, I subbed for a capship, and I was invested in the game because a rl mate of mine, xperia, was playing it too.

I am an anomaly, most f2p's just got this off their app store because they are bored, not because it is a great conversation point/starter.

If the capella is going to be pilotable , why the heavy cruiser for example cant?. Its just sad xd.

The heavy assault cruiser would be too op

Oh, that's who you are g0ku lol. the rugby dude

First of all, no capships for F2P. If you are committed enough to build one then you can pay for the game. Second, how would you buff the dent, more turrets? That makes no sense. it already has 1,000,000 armor and a nice fat shield, and making the cargo bigger is just madness. I have no problem with F2p having access to making FCP and FFSA but anything else they should pay for.
+1 to releasing the Capella (because +1ing it makes a difference to what is already inevitable)

-1 to the "no capships for f2p" buffing the dent would be as simple as MAKING THE TURRET PLACEMENT DECENT

Making the heavy cruiser hard to build would give a good feel to the game. Also the capella will be bigger than the heavy cruiser right?.

Honestly I do think Making a Capship for the F2P would give us a goal but not the goliath something small please. It would be wrong to make something people paid for free. +10 to F2P capship

-1 no free capships.

-1 F2P capships mean less reason to sub.

+1 if goli require 1,000,000 crystals to build and every replacement

well, to be honest capships for f2p sounds like a bad idea, but vendetta online is dying. people are moving on to less expensive games that offer more gameplay like Elite Dangerous, star citizen and so on

Today Destroyer25k wrote:



In what world is SC cheaper than VO for a F2P user? The average F2P player would need to build a PC then buy the game to play on the PC. And SC/ED/etc are not available on mobile. They don't compare to VO's current target market.

SC's ships cost 100+ USD. VO monthly subs cost $9.99 USD.
-1 F2P capships.
-1 Anything else being made F2P.
+1 to FCP and FFSA being made F2P.
-1 to F2P Capships. No.