"Examples of this activity include, but are not limited to,...".

Mmm, non-substantive language. Oh, really, there are other unlisted actions that could be violations? That's so fascinating. I'm sure you have an objective way of figuring out what set of actions those are. Oh, you don't?

How embarassing for you.

Dev conjured Rules of Conduct? So, in essence, Dev rule?

Thanks for playing.

I see objective isn't a word you understand. Unfortunate.

And, with that Dev rules are not objective?

Uh, so telling him that you run nation war, at a time when you did not run nation war, was not dishonest?

Not that I think there's anything wrong with being dishonest in a video game. :)

I maintain that it was not a dishonest act... after all, "Caveat emptor"

Now on the surface it seems a dishonest act, but lets look at the facts...
I'm well known...and honestly, I'm a mostly honorably dishonest opportunist. Which is to say, my intentions are honorable so long as the outcome favors me. Now sometimes I employ methods which to the layman may seem dishonest but honestly... that's all a matter of perception.
Was it dishonest for me to sell a CorVult with no engine to a member of an enemy guild, one perceived to be a dishonest guild?
Was it dishonest to later sell the same person an HAC? If you ask him or his guild, most certainly. If you ask my guild which profited greatly or his guilds enemy guild... an ally of my guild, the line has moved from dishonest to honest.
You can always trust that a dishonest man will work in his own best interests, which you may perceive to be dishonest. However, honestly... it is not.
It's the honestly honest ones you want to watch out for. They honestly believe that they are morally superior and thus try to inflict their beliefs on all who oppose them.

In all honesty, I'd rather deal with the honestly dishonest... with them, you always know where you stand.

And, with that Dev rules are not objective?

Surb...you really don't get it, do you?

RR: Jack Sparrow parody attempt: 3/10

See... I honestly expected that from the Doc.

Go on and explain.

I dunno Lecter, if you read that post out loud in a jack sparrow voice, it works pretty well...

You don't always have to be the ukrainian judge

Don't get me wrong, I'm not impugning on your overall honesty. You did not ask for proof that you are dishonest, only for proof that you did a dishonest thing. If you asked for proof of being dishonest, I wouldn't have bothered, because I would not prove an ally dishonest without good reason. But when asked to point out a single act of dishonesty, and when such an amusing example as this is at hand, I cannot resist. It would be dishonest to my nature to still my tongue in a situation like that.

Alright... I suppose that was a fairly amusing example honestly dishonest nature.

RR: better defense-

"I'm only dishonest when it's hilarious"

On the advice of the BLF's new legal legal representation, I make the following statement... "I'm only dishonest when it's hilarious".

back to topic: I am appalled to hear that [ONE] fought with, not against [ITAN], and will be having words on our forum.

It's true, I have entered Keria many times now. I can truthfully say I have had unrestricted access to her hot tits on more than one occasion.

Think you mean his "hot tits," slime.

Other than that, no... well, actually very concerned.

This thread went weird. Like every thread I start.

This thread went weird. Like every thread I start.

Every word I said was true, though!