Forums » Role Playing
Harpo, yes I had a conversation with them and found out they insisted they take their Neutrality very seriously
I bet they really took neutrality seriously after you attacked that second ship, they probably couldn't make assurances to you fast enough.
I bet they really took neutrality seriously after you attacked that second ship, they probably couldn't make assurances to you fast enough.
1. Would you have made that offer if I hadn't badgered you for 5 weeks? It looked to me like TGFT wanted it to just go away. Good for you for stepping up, if you meant it.
Hey, I helped badger too :P I'll give TGFT the benefit of the doubt; rather than "sweeping it under the rug," maybe the non-kb members really didn't realize just how ugly and mishandled the whole thing was. See sirfropsalot and Sieger's much-welcome replies in the other thread. They apparently really did just think the issue was settled, not realizing that many of us, including plenty of non-crazy pilots, were still wondering about the bizarre behavior from a TGFT councilor, and awaiting comment from the other councilors.
Their official position now seems to be, "kb did fuck up, and made a threat he couldn't enforce by the laws of the charter." Given the prolonged difficulty of this whole thing, that's probably as good as we'll get :P Hopefully Mota feels that way too, as he was the one to actually get shafted by a TGFT councilor behaving like a raving loon
Hey, I helped badger too :P I'll give TGFT the benefit of the doubt; rather than "sweeping it under the rug," maybe the non-kb members really didn't realize just how ugly and mishandled the whole thing was. See sirfropsalot and Sieger's much-welcome replies in the other thread. They apparently really did just think the issue was settled, not realizing that many of us, including plenty of non-crazy pilots, were still wondering about the bizarre behavior from a TGFT councilor, and awaiting comment from the other councilors.
Their official position now seems to be, "kb did fuck up, and made a threat he couldn't enforce by the laws of the charter." Given the prolonged difficulty of this whole thing, that's probably as good as we'll get :P Hopefully Mota feels that way too, as he was the one to actually get shafted by a TGFT councilor behaving like a raving loon
(Ganking is far away from "group" fighting)
I'm laughing so hard right now. :D
I'm laughing so hard right now. :D
'Ganking is far away from "group" fighting'
I'd love to read your definition of group fighting.
Edit: Damn you Arf!
I'd love to read your definition of group fighting.
Edit: Damn you Arf!
(Ganking is far away from "group" fighting).
oh LOL. Man you really got your head up your own ass with that one. lmao.
oh LOL. Man you really got your head up your own ass with that one. lmao.
he likely means group vs group fighting. hes right there with that. wtf is your issue anyway. picking at typos is all skv can do to defend their position? lol
he likely means group vs group fighting. hes right there with that. wtf is your issue anyway. picking at typos is all skv can do to defend their position? lol
First of all, it wasn't a typo. Secondly, I have no problem with ganks, they're a valid part of the game. We were laughing at it because it hilarious that he doesn't consider ganks to be a group fight (which it is). I handle 3-4 ONE just fine by myself, and Sieger is whining because he is taking on SKV in a war which he instigated?
lulz.
First of all, it wasn't a typo. Secondly, I have no problem with ganks, they're a valid part of the game. We were laughing at it because it hilarious that he doesn't consider ganks to be a group fight (which it is). I handle 3-4 ONE just fine by myself, and Sieger is whining because he is taking on SKV in a war which he instigated?
lulz.
Drag a guild full of unwitting non-combatants into a war against a team of seasoned vets, then complain that nobody's got your back?
Seems legit... :P
Seems legit... :P