Forums » Suggestions

BioCom Ragnarok Rhino Variant

12»
Apr 04, 2009 bill316 link
Xang Xi Ragnarok Rhino/Armageddon
(disregard the faction in the thread name)
Armor: 21,300
Cargo: 6cu
Weapons: 3 Small 2 Large
Mass: 20,000kg
Length: 19m
Thrust: 550N
Max Speed: 65 m/s
Spin torque: 10.5 Nm
Turbo Max Speed: 190 m/s
Turbo energy: 50/sec

Designed especially for heavy assaults, i.e queening, hive skirmishes. Greatly increased armor sacrificing cargo space and more mass. With the high mass and slightly lower turbo speed, it stops players taking advantage of it's high armor for things like pirating.
Criticism and suggestions welcome.

Licenses needed: 6/2/5/-/-

bill316 a.k.a Ostan-Be Ralel
Apr 04, 2009 Sraer link
I like it!
Apr 04, 2009 missioncreek2 link
The rag is clumsy as it is, and BioCom is a long way from Sedina. I don't think you have to penalize the performance so much for the sake of balance. Though extra armor should be heavier. Perhaps increase the thrust to 550.
Apr 04, 2009 bill316 link
Thanks missioncreek2, wasn't too sure about the thrust. But what do you mean by 'BioCom is a long way from Sedina'?

Edits made: Thrust changed to 550
Spin torque changed to 10.5 Nm
Apr 04, 2009 bill316 link
Sraer: I like it too, but then I like most heavy ships. Also, could anyone think of a better name/faction for it?
Apr 04, 2009 ryan reign link
I like it but, I too like most heavy ships. I don't think I've ever seen a pirate in a 'Rag though. Why not give it to a faction that has no special ships...(Biocom has a few).

I would change the cargo though.
"Designed especially for heavy assaults, i.e queening, hive skirmishes"

That doesn't really require much cargo room... maybe give it 6 instead?

"Ragnarok Armageddon"
Apr 04, 2009 Spedy link
Wheee. This will be fun to killing hive in, especially with fireball launchers.

[Approved]
Apr 05, 2009 missioncreek2 link
Biocom stations are few in number and clustered in the north part of UIT space. The travel time to move one to a hot spot like sedina will discourage their use more than any thing. For example I never see a biocom Vulture in b8. Given that, I see no problem in buffing the new rhino even more. It will not be used much any way.
Apr 05, 2009 bill316 link
Ryan: Nice name!
missioncreek2: Maybe Xang Xi would be a better faction

Edits made: Armageddon accepted as suggested name.
Cargo reduced to 6cu
Faction changed to Xang Xi

wow, i actually have high hopes that this will be added to the game! :D
Jul 11, 2010 Crusader8389 link
Maybe give this to ineubis? There is one in odia and bractus, which are near sedina... would require pilots to transport a few across to sedina to use them regularly, making it a bit more difficult to obtain ;)
Jul 11, 2010 meridian link
My vote is to keep the faction Xang Xi. The XX stations at Latos C2 and Sedina L2 sell chaos/gems for bombing, and both those systems have HS.

The Ineubis station in Odia is a mining station (no chaos or gems), not really the best place to buy a combat ship. The Bractus Ineubis station does sell chaos/gems, but there is no HS there and it is not a very good system for queening (no collectors to follow).
Jul 11, 2010 Chaosis link
+1

Now wheres my axia banshee, dammit.
Jul 11, 2010 pirren link
Well, nice idea in general.

1. What about turbo thrusts?
2. Price?
3. Maybe make max speed 180 but add turret port, stern or even in the front, (e.g. for shield turret use).

Here are my MkIV suggestions to compare, (with turret port):
http://www.vendetta-online.com/x/msgboard/3/23336
Jul 11, 2010 tarenty link
+1

I'd keep it XX, as XX has no current ships of their own.

IMHO, 75k might make a good price.
Jul 12, 2010 Alloh link
Indeed, bombers should be slower and more armoured.

+1 anyway to concept. But give it to TPG instead, they like heavy boats!
Jul 12, 2010 pirren link
But give it to TPG instead, they like heavy boats!

TPG already constructed and designed many ships, while XX doesn't have any ship at all.
Jul 12, 2010 tarenty link
TPG has seven ships.
Jul 17, 2010 Crusader8389 link
Yes, give to XX... didn't know they had no ships Oo

License reqs: 7/3/8/-/- (we need more for higher levels!)

+1!!!!!!!
Jul 20, 2010 pirren link
+1 to high license reqs.
Jul 20, 2010 Alloh link
Definitly, a heavy bomber should be more armoured AND have defense turrets. Even B-52 have, only stealth bombers does not...

+1 to TURRET in Rag4

What about change its weapon ports to 3L 1S 1T ??