Forums » Off-Topic
Quidquid Latine dictum sit altum videtur.
I don't accept "education" from propaganda artists.
https://twitter.com/neilvogel?lang=en
https://www.thoughtco.com/about-us
Ever consider stepping outside the echo chamber? You're getting "education" along with the rest of your beliefs from the people most guilty for using the nazi/hitler card.
The "progressive" cries out in pain as he strikes you.
I don't accept "education" from propaganda artists.
https://twitter.com/neilvogel?lang=en
https://www.thoughtco.com/about-us
Ever consider stepping outside the echo chamber? You're getting "education" along with the rest of your beliefs from the people most guilty for using the nazi/hitler card.
The "progressive" cries out in pain as he strikes you.
I don't accept "education" from propaganda artists.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisoning_the_well
If I had a dollar for every fallacy you've made in this thread alone I'd be richer than Bill Gates.
Ever consider stepping outside the echo chamber?
I cannot put this into words just how rich it is coming from you.
I do watch Fox and other online conservative media, even occasionally breitbart, to see what they have to say about stuff. Taking in different views in the world is always refreshing and positively educational.
You on the other hand automatically label anything that's liberal as "fake news." Talk about echo chambers.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisoning_the_well
If I had a dollar for every fallacy you've made in this thread alone I'd be richer than Bill Gates.
Ever consider stepping outside the echo chamber?
I cannot put this into words just how rich it is coming from you.
I do watch Fox and other online conservative media, even occasionally breitbart, to see what they have to say about stuff. Taking in different views in the world is always refreshing and positively educational.
You on the other hand automatically label anything that's liberal as "fake news." Talk about echo chambers.
No you don't you just say you do.
The conservative perception:
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/07/21/study-nearly-half-of-liberals-feel-disdain-for-trump-supporters-conservatives-far-more-tolerant/
The reality:
Me: Vote for Democrat if you want to keep Net Neutrality.
Mi5:
Tolerance much?
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/07/21/study-nearly-half-of-liberals-feel-disdain-for-trump-supporters-conservatives-far-more-tolerant/
The reality:
Me: Vote for Democrat if you want to keep Net Neutrality.
Mi5:
Tolerance much?
I'm mad because JJ says so, look he used a gif it must be true.
You accost me for reading brietbart and fox, but use them to try and support your argument.(or lack thereof)
You accost me for reading brietbart and fox, but use them to try and support your argument.(or lack thereof)
So are you two going to limit your attacks to each other's arguments, or would you like to stop posting?
I refrained from replying at all because there's literally no substance to his latest posts.
He didn't like how I cited sources with a liberal bias, automatically labelling them fake and evil without verifying their points and facts, which is poisoning the well of course. NOW he doesn't want me to cite from conservative sources either, apparently because he's upset that at some point in the past I told him he needs to diversify his news sources more.
What the hell? He's making everyone very dizzy from how often he moves the goalpost.
I think everyone has seen enough of his true colors.
So whistler, you may lock this if you think it's best.
He didn't like how I cited sources with a liberal bias, automatically labelling them fake and evil without verifying their points and facts, which is poisoning the well of course. NOW he doesn't want me to cite from conservative sources either, apparently because he's upset that at some point in the past I told him he needs to diversify his news sources more.
What the hell? He's making everyone very dizzy from how often he moves the goalpost.
I think everyone has seen enough of his true colors.
So whistler, you may lock this if you think it's best.
Hypocrite.
God this is still going?
Maybe he wants you to cite a third party post.
Whistler. Can this get locked? It's far beyond my control now
Maybe he wants you to cite a third party post.
No. You have much to learn, my dear padawan.
The issue here is that he firmly believes he has logic and evidence on his side, however the reality is that a lot of his positions are more emotion based than he is willing to admit to himself.
In order to make his worldview work, "all liberals" have to be ignorant, lazy, and stupid, which is a faulty generalization. This is why you see him refusing to accept that someone like me might be capable of treating conservative and liberal news sources with equal objectivity.
It's very likely that he has some deep psychological issues which I will not discuss here, because Whistler wouldn't appreciate it.
No. You have much to learn, my dear padawan.
The issue here is that he firmly believes he has logic and evidence on his side, however the reality is that a lot of his positions are more emotion based than he is willing to admit to himself.
In order to make his worldview work, "all liberals" have to be ignorant, lazy, and stupid, which is a faulty generalization. This is why you see him refusing to accept that someone like me might be capable of treating conservative and liberal news sources with equal objectivity.
It's very likely that he has some deep psychological issues which I will not discuss here, because Whistler wouldn't appreciate it.
So, in case you missed it, the republican party, with a 52-48 majority in congress, failed to repeal the ACA.
Meanwhile,
Meanwhile,
genka where did you find a picture of my house on the internet?